Monday, 27 October 2008

Richard Leakey, biodiversity and gloom

Came across an interesting article today by Richard Leakey. It seems that the South African government have now put elephant culls back on the agenda and seem set to reintroduce them (having banned them in the nineties). In one sense the conservation project with the elephants worked too well.

Now Leakey is a paleontologist. I may be doing him a dis-service here, and if so I apologise, but he's not a scientifically trained paleontologist. He learned everything from his parents, who worked the Olduvai gorge in Kenya for many years in the first half of the twentieth century and turned up Homo Erectus, Australapithicus Robustus and in no small way contributed to the knowledge of how rich the 'bush' of early human evolution was. Richard made his contribution to the knowledge about human evolution over a number of years during the 50's and 60's until going on to become Director of Wildlife for the Kenyan Government. (I have a suspicion he just does the lecture circuit now.) Now Leakey gained a bit of a reputation for being bull headed about his own theories of human evolution (I think he was just miffed over Johanson's discovery of australapithicus afarensis, 'Lucy', and the ensuing accolades) and about wildlife in general and it was interesting to see how the old tub thumper had mellowed :)

His article was suggesting that, perhaps, a cull might be necessary.

Now, obviously, as a non-human, I don't think humans have the right to manage the planet for their own benefit, which is, in effect, what the proposed cull is all about. Humans are encroaching more and more on elephant territory, as populations increase, and elephants are being forced into far smaller areas than can sustain them. This means that they end up destroying the area in which they do live to the detriment of other wildlife in the area and ultimately to themselves. If elephants cannot 'roam', they end up turning the environment into a desert and Africa has a big enough problem with desertification as it is!

What was interesting, perhaps much more than the article itself, which tried to take a balanced view, although I fear Leakey was gently sobbing as he wrote it, were the comments. They broadly fell into three camps. Those who reluctantly agreed with Leakey's analysis, those who were opposed to the cull for the same reasons that this penguin is - nothing gives you the right despite what you believe your God may have said in an unguarded moment, off the record, and those who had veered so far towards misanthropy that enforced sterilisation or 'human culling' were being put into the mix, although there weren't an awful lot of them who actually lived in Africa!

It seems to this penguin that this is just another example of the perennial problem 'Man' will always face . Most, if not all, of the creatures on the planet evolved to deal with situations in which man was not present. You are a recent addition to the daily roll call of species. Perhaps less than 40,000 years. Evolution, except in rare cases, does not move so fast. None of us, restricted to natural selection, as we are, can evolve fast enough to deal with you, with a few notable exceptions. The rat, the 'urban' fox, the magpie, although they are largely pre-adaptations. The niche they evolved into has certain similarities with the niches you create. And so they prosper.

But then how does man react? Is it possible to find a route through the morass you have created? In the end, this penguin thinks not. In the end, man will take the product of billions of years of evolution and turn it into little more than a concrete jungle punctuated by the occasional biodiversity theme park. One of the things that Ridley Scott left out of his version of 'Do androids dream of electric sheep' (Blade Runner) was the idea that only human constructed 'animals', using genetic engineering, were possible. Naturally occurring animals had long since died out. One of the most poignant parts of the book is where the narrator of the book thinks he has discovered a real animal, only to later discover it has a 'signature' of its maker. It is a dreary thought, but one which I think will come to fruition. Hopefully not in my lifetime, nor 'little Fricka's' but what an inheritance I leave my daughter and her chicks!

8 comments:

  1. Ah, so pessimistic today, Penguin? Have no fear. When humans have done their worst, Gaia will rear and teach them what their mortality means. She has started from scratch once, I do not doubt that she can do it again.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Good post! but I am here because you are interested in Quantum mechanics I am an artist but I have a theory on the two slit experiment. It would be nice to know what you think of it?
    I have linked Newtons laws of motion with gravity and time.

    All the best nick
    the Penguin picture nice!!

    ReplyDelete
  3. I'm not sure what your theory is trying to do here? If you haven't read 'There is a grandeur in this view of life' post this month, then that will probably explain what follows.

    The penguin has done his best to take this seriously :) but any new scientific theory should explain observations which existing theories don't or explain them better :)

    1) Newton has been overtaken, by general concensus, by general relativity which no longer separates time from space and so, your theory in making them two separate things again (and whatever you may say, you have :), one arising from the expansion of the other, it would need to explain a lot more than it does at present :) eg how do singularites develop if all the atoms are expanding in 'space' or even space-time?

    2) Contrary to popular belief, Einstein did not win the Nobel Prize for Special or General Relativity, he won it for a paper on Brownian Motion. There is, as far as I am aware, no experimental evidence to suggest that Einstein's interpretation of what is going on is flawed within conventional quantum mechanics and I don't see that expanding atoms are necessary.

    You also need to explain the mechanism whereby the three atoms in a water molecule expand in 'lock step' with each other so that the shared electrons do not end up only in one atom or another, which would break the bond and would make water completely unstable and much rarer than it appears to be to this penguin :).

    3) Quantum Electrodynamics itself says light quanta travel all available paths, except, as your theory doesn't, it also explains why light appears to travel in a straight predictable path. (The probability amplitudes of 'most paths' cancel each other out - Feynman's 'sum over histories')

    Your two slit explanation also postulates 'two' quanta from one, that would require one quantum of energy which would have to be borrowed and given back, acceptable within the limits of the uncertainty principle but you appear to have abandoned that :) So you are going to need to generate a way of explaining the inherant uncertainty of quantum mechanics not just the single example you have chosen. For example, how does your theory explain that there is only a statistical probablity of a particular outcome/event but that probablity can be both calculated and tested experimentally.

    You also need to calculate whether the energy required to produce your 'second' photon needs to be returned before or after it hits the screen, if before - no interference.

    More plausible to this penguin is one photon 'smeared' in space-time.

    4) Expanding atoms goes against the experimental evidence which indicates that the strong force which binds the nucleus together is only effective at short range, your theory would require it to grow as 'distance' increased, otherwise the nucleus would 'fall apart'. As importantly if only the electron 'cloud' is expanding the atom would eventually cease to be an atom, merely a nucleus, nothing would hold the electrons in orbit.

    I could go on :) but to challenge the standard quantum mechanical view, you will need to provide some sound mathematical equations which will allow us to predict the rate of expansion of any atom at any energy range and also an experiment to enable us to detect the expansion and measure its rate otherwise this is just so much 'creation science' isn't it?:)

    Oh, and thanks for the kind words on the pic. There's another in 'Jean-Paul vs Albert, Rain stopped play' in September

    ReplyDelete
  4. Hmm. Going to have to go back and re-read your response. How is it that you know so much Penguin?

    ReplyDelete
  5. Genius? :)

    No, a lifetime of reading and a retentive memory, the latter being the essential item in the toolkit if one wishes to master languages other than ones's own, including SQL. The ability to be able to remember many, many years on that 'Bitte, Hilfe! Die Ohrtrompete meiner Grossmutter wurde von Blitz getroffen.' means "Please, help! My grandmother's ear trumpet has been struck by lightning." can be quite useful :)

    ReplyDelete
  6. Penguin,

    can you please email comment #2 &#3to the email address below?

    Thank you.

    ihaveabooktowrite@gmail.com

    PS- no, I'm not putting it in a book. I want to print and read it.

    ReplyDelete
  7. "Hi whoever you are

    Text below (in an email). If I start getting more emails from Elena, I'll know who to blame! Please be aware that this penguin can hack :) Google's about as secure as Angelina's gusset! I will find out who you are :)

    For the future, highlight the text you want to copy, use whatever 'copy' command is appropriate to your OS, open the standard text editor that will come with your OS, open a new document and paste! Then print. The penguin is however a generous soul. So.......

    The link to the original post where this response also will reside when it's been 'vetted' is:

    http://quantumartandpoetry.blogspot.com/2008/10/theory-of-everything.html"

    Sometimes, the penguin feels that some people should not be allowed within ten yards of a computer.......An interest in Quantum Mechanics and they can't copy and paste? :)

    ReplyDelete
  8. Scratch the Nobel for Brownian Motion. I have no idea why that was lodged in my head at all. 'Contributions to QM and the photoelectric effect'. Thanks to a poster on the other blog for that! The penguin is nothing if not humble :)

    ReplyDelete